www.pacificparanormal.com

Research and Reference => Show and Tell => Topic started by: PPI Brian on July 09, 2007, 09:01:43 PM

Poll
Question: Does this FLIR video show a full body appartition or is it a matrix?
Option 1: Full Body Apparition votes: 9
Option 2: Matrix votes: 0
Option 3: I Don't Know votes: 1
Title: Full Body Appartion or Matrix?
Post by: PPI Brian on July 09, 2007, 09:01:43 PM
Crescent Hotel Investigation:

Is this a full-body apparition, or is it matrixing??  ???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wWwQXYf-70&mode=related&search=
Title: Re: Full Body Appartion or Matrix?
Post by: PPI Glenn on July 10, 2007, 02:14:07 PM
I think its definitely a full body apparition - they tried everything they could to debunk it and couldn't even come close.
Title: Re: Full Body Appartion or Matrix?
Post by: dwalters on July 10, 2007, 02:16:26 PM
the apparition "really" looks like it's wearing a hat, and Grant is clrealy NOT wearing one. Also there are differences in the shirts....to me anyways.
Title: Re: Full Body Appartion or Matrix?
Post by: lkasak on July 10, 2007, 04:01:19 PM
I say full body - the Holy Grail!!
Title: Re: Full Body Appartion or Matrix?
Post by: IBelieveNoOne on September 17, 2007, 07:16:22 PM
I love the Ghost Hunters show! I think that they tried very hard to debunk this one and couldn't even come close to figuring out how this was created. I think it's genuine - not to mention the "hot" number was really unexplainable - totally wierd.....
Title: Re: Full Body Appartion or Matrix?
Post by: PPI Brian on September 17, 2007, 08:29:58 PM
Quote from: IBelieveNoOne on September 17, 2007, 07:16:22 PM
I love the Ghost Hunters show! I think that they tried very hard to debunk this one and couldn't even come close to figuring out how this was created. I think it's genuine - not to mention the "hot" number was really unexplainable - totally wierd.....


Yes, the "hot" number was strange. I would like an opportunity to look at that number in person... was it an old number that may have been painted with radium? Was it a more recent "glow-in-the-dark" (non-radioactive) number? So many questions...